Oxford Reference. Publications Pages Publications Pages. Recently viewed 0 Save Search. Your current browser may not support copying via this button. Subscriber sign in You could not be signed in, please check and try again.
Username Please enter your Username. Password Please enter your Password. Style: MLA. Get Word of the Day daily email! Test Your Vocabulary. Test your visual vocabulary with our question challenge! Need even more definitions? Just between us: it's complicated. However, they all offer the same critique of economic man: the reduction of economic actors to first principles is not robust enough to provide a full explanation of economic activity or markets.
Behavioral Economics. Wealth Management. Trading Psychology. Your Privacy Rights. To change or withdraw your consent choices for Investopedia. At any time, you can update your settings through the "EU Privacy" link at the bottom of any page. These choices will be signaled globally to our partners and will not affect browsing data.
We and our partners process data to: Actively scan device characteristics for identification. I Accept Show Purposes. Your Money. Personal Finance. Your Practice. Popular Courses. Wealth Lifestyle Advice. What Is an Economic Man? Key Takeaways The economic man is a concept developed by economists to understand the behavior of humans engaged in economic activity.
The abstraction known as the economic man was developed in the 19th century by philosophers like John Stuart Mill as part of the broader enlightenment project, the aim of which was to bring natural science to bear on all areas of knowledge. Later research in the late 20th and 21st centuries, referred to as behavioral economics, has challenged the legitimacy of the economic man abstraction.
The homo economicus also has an unlimited cognitive capacity and can process any amount of information, regardless of its quantity, quality, or complexity.
Furthermore, the homo economicus has access to all the relevant information that relates to the decisions they have to make. The homo economicus possesses narrow self-interest; they are only concerned with helping themselves. Finally, the homo economicus' preferences and goals remain constant over time.
The homo economicus is a cornerstone of the neoclassical economics approach, particularly in microeconomics. In modern economics, the neoclassical theory rests on three assumptions: rational decisions, maximization of utility, and a self-interested orientation. This assumes that individuals are conscious of making decisions based on their own self-interest, that individuals have relevant and full information so they can make a rational calculation that would maximize utility, and that the primary goal for companies is to maximize profits and for individuals, to maximize utility.
Companies accomplish this by adding to their workforce until a point where the value of the output balances the additional cost of hiring workers. Consumers attempt to maximize utility by paying for goods and services up to the point that the amount they pay balances the satisfaction gained from an extra unit. History and various economic crises over the years have proved that the theory of an economic man is a flawed one.
Daniel Kahneman , an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel laureate, and Amos Tversky, a leading expert in judgment and human decision making, founded the field of behavioral economics with their paper, "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Kahneman and Tversky researched human risk aversion, finding that people's attitudes regarding risks associated with gains are different from those concerning losses. Homo economicus, and the idea that humans always act rationally, is challenged by risk aversion.
Because there are many criticisms of the homo economicus model, there have been alternative models of human decision-making that have been proposed over the years. Here are a few of them:. Homo reciprocans: The homo reciprocans is a person who rewards positive actions and punishes negative actions. Homo politicus: The homo politicus is a person that always acts in a way that is consistent with what is best for society.
Homo sociologicus: The homo sociologicus is a person that is not always perfectly rational because they are affected by society; they strive to fulfill their role in society but are also influenced by societal forces.
It's important to keep in mind that these models are not mutually exclusive. For example, while a person may act like a homo reciprocans in one situation, they may act like a homo politicus in a different situation. The most common example provided of the homo economicus is that of a businessperson. The businessperson seeks to eke out profits from each transaction and decision.
For example, they may automate operations and lay off workers in order to maximize productivity. Similarly, they might get rid of non-performing parts of their business to focus on the ones that generate profits. Nobody, not even Nobel-winning economists, really makes decisions that way.
The homo economicus brings the same rationality to their dealings in other spheres of life. But the theory falls short in explaining the rationale behind some seemingly irrational decisions.
For example, rationality should dictate that the rational business person should use profits from their business to live a fairly frugal existence. But that is not always the case. The prevalence of luxury items and philanthropy are direct refutations of the theory. The idea of the homo economicus was introduced by John Stuart Mill in the 19th century in an essay about the political economy. Mill's theory was an extension of other ideas proposed by economists, such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo, who also saw humans as primarily self-interested economic agents.
0コメント